US judges affirm migrants must have opportunities to voice safety concerns before deportation to unfamiliar nations.Published On 19 Sep 202619 Sep 2026A US federal appeals court has rejected the Trump administration’s policy of rapidly deporting migrants to countries other than their own – a ruling that could next go before the Supreme Court.On Friday, a three-judge panel of the 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston largely upheld a February decision that found the Department of Homeland Security’s so-called third-country removal policy unlawful.Recommended Stories list of 3 itemslist 1 of 3Why are election officials in the US preparing for chaos before midterms?list 2 of 3US judge blocks Trump’s latest effort to limit birthright citizenshiplist 3 of 3Trump administration proposes excluding certain immigrants from US censusend of listThe case stems from a class-action lawsuit testing what due process migrants are owed before being sent to nations with which they have no ties.Writing for the panel, US Circuit Judge Seth Aframe said migrants must be given a “meaningful” chance to raise safety concerns before removal, rejecting the Trump administration’s narrower reading of the la...

6 hours ago
10






English (US) ·