An Iowa landlord who said he lost roughly $700,000 in what he described as a Ponzi scheme has failed to overturn a $351,446 divorce payment to his former wife. The Iowa Court of Appeals upheld the award, rejecting his argument that much of the property at issue had been his before the marriage and should therefore have been excluded from the division, according to the court’s published decision on Justia U.S. Law.The case illustrates how courts treat premarital assets when they are mixed with marital property or affected by events during the marriage. The husband said a large part of the wealth belonged to him, but the appeals court said the trial court was within its discretion in ordering the payment.The dispute over propertyThe husband entered the marriage with substantial assets, including real estate and other investments. He argued that these holdings were premarital property and should not have been counted as part of the marital estate when the divorce was finalised. During the marriage, the value of some of those assets changed, and the husband later said that a large part of his wealth had been lost through a Ponzi scheme. He claimed the loss, estimated at around $700,000...








English (US) ·